{"id":13996,"date":"2026-03-02T09:15:31","date_gmt":"2026-03-02T09:15:31","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/abeille.law\/?p=13996"},"modified":"2026-03-03T09:18:06","modified_gmt":"2026-03-03T09:18:06","slug":"affichage-irregulier-mais-non-substantiel-application-du-delai-raisonnable-czabaj-au-recours-des-tiers-ta-marseille-4e-ch-24-dec-2025-n","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/abeille.law\/en\/affichage-irregulier-mais-non-substantiel-application-du-delai-raisonnable-czabaj-au-recours-des-tiers-ta-marseille-4e-ch-24-dec-2025-n\/","title":{"rendered":"Affichage irr\u00e9gulier mais non substantiel : application du d\u00e9lai raisonnable\u00a0\u00ab\u202fCzabaj\u202f\u00bb\u00a0\u00a0au\u00a0recours des tiers (TA Marseille, 4e ch., 24 d\u00e9c. 2025, n\u00b0 2406698)\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0"},"content":{"rendered":"\n<p>Le tribunal rappelle que les recours pour exc\u00e8s de pouvoir form\u00e9s par les tiers contre les autorisations d\u2019urbanisme sont soumis au principe de&nbsp;<strong>s\u00e9curit\u00e9 juridique<\/strong>&nbsp;d\u00e9gag\u00e9 par le Conseil d\u2019\u00c9tat,&nbsp;Ass., 13 juillet 2016,&nbsp;<strong>Czabaj<\/strong>.&nbsp;<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Ce principe s\u2019applique aux permis de construire, permis d\u2019am\u00e9nager, permis de d\u00e9molir et d\u00e9cisions de non-opposition \u00e0 d\u00e9claration pr\u00e9alable.&nbsp;<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>En mati\u00e8re d\u2019urbanisme, le Conseil d\u2019\u00c9tat a d\u00e9j\u00e0 jug\u00e9 que, m\u00eame lorsque l\u2019affichage ne fait pas courir le d\u00e9lai de deux mois faute de mention r\u00e9guli\u00e8re, le recours ne peut \u00eatre exerc\u00e9 au-del\u00e0 d\u2019un d\u00e9lai raisonnable (Conseil d\u2019\u00c9tat, 9 novembre 2018,&nbsp;Vali\u00e8re).&nbsp;<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Plus r\u00e9cemment, il a retenu la m\u00eame logique en mati\u00e8re contractuelle, en l\u2019absence de publicit\u00e9 appropri\u00e9e (Conseil d\u2019\u00c9tat, 19 juillet 2023, Soci\u00e9t\u00e9&nbsp;Seateam&nbsp;aviation).&nbsp;<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Le tribunal \u00e9tend ici cette exigence au cas d\u2019un affichage comportant&nbsp;une erreur dans les mentions requises par l\u2019article R. 424-15 du code de l\u2019urbanisme, d\u00e8s lors que cette erreur n\u2019est pas de nature \u00e0 alt\u00e9rer l\u2019appr\u00e9ciation, par les tiers, de l\u2019importance et de la consistance du projet.&nbsp;<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>En l\u2019esp\u00e8ce, le panneau mentionnait la hauteur du b\u00e2timent \u00e0 l\u2019\u00e9gout du toit et non au fa\u00eetage, contrairement aux r\u00e8gles du PLU. L\u2019\u00e9cart atteignait 2,10 m\u00e8tres.&nbsp;<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Toutefois, au regard des autres indications figurant sur le panneau (nature du projet, ampleur, surface de plancher), cette erreur n\u2019a pas \u00e9t\u00e9 jug\u00e9e substantielle.&nbsp;<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Elle ne compromettait pas la compr\u00e9hension globale du projet par les tiers.&nbsp;<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Le recours dirig\u00e9 contre le permis initial, introduit plus de quatre ans apr\u00e8s l\u2019affichage, est donc jug\u00e9 tardif, au regard du d\u00e9lai raisonnable.&nbsp;<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Le tribunal rappelle que les recours pour exc\u00e8s de pouvoir form\u00e9s par les tiers contre les autorisations d\u2019urbanisme sont soumis au principe de&nbsp;s\u00e9curit\u00e9 juridique&nbsp;d\u00e9gag\u00e9 par le Conseil d\u2019\u00c9tat,&nbsp;Ass., 13 juillet 2016,&nbsp;Czabaj.&nbsp; Ce principe s\u2019applique aux permis de construire, permis d\u2019am\u00e9nager, permis de d\u00e9molir et d\u00e9cisions de non-opposition \u00e0 d\u00e9claration pr\u00e9alable.&nbsp; En mati\u00e8re d\u2019urbanisme, le Conseil [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":18,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[253,190],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-13996","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-format","category-juridiques"],"acf":[],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v27.1.1 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Affichage irr\u00e9gulier et d\u00e9lai raisonnable : le TA Marseille applique la jurisprudence Czabaj aux recours des tiers | Abeille Avocats<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"Erreur d\u2019affichage non substantielle : le TA Marseille applique le d\u00e9lai raisonnable Czabaj et juge tardif le recours d\u2019un tiers introduit quatre ans apr\u00e8s le permis.\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/abeille.law\/affichage-irregulier-mais-non-substantiel-application-du-delai-raisonnable-czabaj-au-recours-des-tiers-ta-marseille-4e-ch-24-dec-2025-n\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Affichage irr\u00e9gulier et d\u00e9lai raisonnable : le TA Marseille applique la jurisprudence Czabaj aux recours des tiers | Abeille Avocats\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Erreur d\u2019affichage non substantielle : le TA Marseille applique le d\u00e9lai raisonnable Czabaj et juge tardif le recours d\u2019un tiers introduit quatre ans apr\u00e8s le permis.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/abeille.law\/affichage-irregulier-mais-non-substantiel-application-du-delai-raisonnable-czabaj-au-recours-des-tiers-ta-marseille-4e-ch-24-dec-2025-n\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Abeille Avocats\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2026-03-02T09:15:31+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2026-03-03T09:18:06+00:00\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Alexia\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Alexia\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"2 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/abeille.law\/affichage-irregulier-mais-non-substantiel-application-du-delai-raisonnable-czabaj-au-recours-des-tiers-ta-marseille-4e-ch-24-dec-2025-n\/#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/abeille.law\/affichage-irregulier-mais-non-substantiel-application-du-delai-raisonnable-czabaj-au-recours-des-tiers-ta-marseille-4e-ch-24-dec-2025-n\/\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Alexia\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/abeille.law\/#\/schema\/person\/74121f107200139ab163607c1e620a36\"},\"headline\":\"Affichage irr\u00e9gulier mais non substantiel : application du d\u00e9lai raisonnable\u00a0\u00ab\u202fCzabaj\u202f\u00bb\u00a0\u00a0au\u00a0recours des tiers (TA Marseille, 4e ch., 24 d\u00e9c. 2025, n\u00b0 2406698)\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\",\"datePublished\":\"2026-03-02T09:15:31+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2026-03-03T09:18:06+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/abeille.law\/affichage-irregulier-mais-non-substantiel-application-du-delai-raisonnable-czabaj-au-recours-des-tiers-ta-marseille-4e-ch-24-dec-2025-n\/\"},\"wordCount\":339,\"commentCount\":0,\"articleSection\":[\"Actualit\u00e9s\",\"Juridiques\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/abeille.law\/affichage-irregulier-mais-non-substantiel-application-du-delai-raisonnable-czabaj-au-recours-des-tiers-ta-marseille-4e-ch-24-dec-2025-n\/#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/abeille.law\/affichage-irregulier-mais-non-substantiel-application-du-delai-raisonnable-czabaj-au-recours-des-tiers-ta-marseille-4e-ch-24-dec-2025-n\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/abeille.law\/affichage-irregulier-mais-non-substantiel-application-du-delai-raisonnable-czabaj-au-recours-des-tiers-ta-marseille-4e-ch-24-dec-2025-n\/\",\"name\":\"Affichage irr\u00e9gulier et d\u00e9lai raisonnable : le TA Marseille applique la jurisprudence Czabaj aux recours des tiers | Abeille Avocats\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/abeille.law\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2026-03-02T09:15:31+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2026-03-03T09:18:06+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/abeille.law\/#\/schema\/person\/74121f107200139ab163607c1e620a36\"},\"description\":\"Erreur d\u2019affichage non substantielle : le TA Marseille applique le d\u00e9lai raisonnable Czabaj et juge tardif le recours d\u2019un tiers introduit quatre ans apr\u00e8s le permis.\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/abeille.law\/affichage-irregulier-mais-non-substantiel-application-du-delai-raisonnable-czabaj-au-recours-des-tiers-ta-marseille-4e-ch-24-dec-2025-n\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/abeille.law\/affichage-irregulier-mais-non-substantiel-application-du-delai-raisonnable-czabaj-au-recours-des-tiers-ta-marseille-4e-ch-24-dec-2025-n\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/abeille.law\/affichage-irregulier-mais-non-substantiel-application-du-delai-raisonnable-czabaj-au-recours-des-tiers-ta-marseille-4e-ch-24-dec-2025-n\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Accueil\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/abeille.law\/en\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Affichage irr\u00e9gulier mais non substantiel : application du d\u00e9lai raisonnable\u00a0\u00ab\u202fCzabaj\u202f\u00bb\u00a0\u00a0au\u00a0recours des tiers (TA Marseille, 4e ch., 24 d\u00e9c. 2025, n\u00b0 2406698)\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/abeille.law\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/abeille.law\/\",\"name\":\"Abeille Avocats\",\"description\":\"\",\"alternateName\":\"Abeille Avocats\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/abeille.law\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/abeille.law\/#\/schema\/person\/74121f107200139ab163607c1e620a36\",\"name\":\"Alexia\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/abeille.law\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/abeille.law\/wp-content\/litespeed\/avatar\/f92646323a75d95d28b83ef6b84450d2.jpg?ver=1778762123\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/abeille.law\/wp-content\/litespeed\/avatar\/f92646323a75d95d28b83ef6b84450d2.jpg?ver=1778762123\",\"caption\":\"Alexia\"}}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Affichage irr\u00e9gulier et d\u00e9lai raisonnable : le TA Marseille applique la jurisprudence Czabaj aux recours des tiers | Abeille Avocats","description":"Erreur d\u2019affichage non substantielle : le TA Marseille applique le d\u00e9lai raisonnable Czabaj et juge tardif le recours d\u2019un tiers introduit quatre ans apr\u00e8s le permis.","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/abeille.law\/affichage-irregulier-mais-non-substantiel-application-du-delai-raisonnable-czabaj-au-recours-des-tiers-ta-marseille-4e-ch-24-dec-2025-n\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Affichage irr\u00e9gulier et d\u00e9lai raisonnable : le TA Marseille applique la jurisprudence Czabaj aux recours des tiers | Abeille Avocats","og_description":"Erreur d\u2019affichage non substantielle : le TA Marseille applique le d\u00e9lai raisonnable Czabaj et juge tardif le recours d\u2019un tiers introduit quatre ans apr\u00e8s le permis.","og_url":"https:\/\/abeille.law\/affichage-irregulier-mais-non-substantiel-application-du-delai-raisonnable-czabaj-au-recours-des-tiers-ta-marseille-4e-ch-24-dec-2025-n\/","og_site_name":"Abeille Avocats","article_published_time":"2026-03-02T09:15:31+00:00","article_modified_time":"2026-03-03T09:18:06+00:00","author":"Alexia","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Alexia","Est. reading time":"2 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/abeille.law\/affichage-irregulier-mais-non-substantiel-application-du-delai-raisonnable-czabaj-au-recours-des-tiers-ta-marseille-4e-ch-24-dec-2025-n\/#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/abeille.law\/affichage-irregulier-mais-non-substantiel-application-du-delai-raisonnable-czabaj-au-recours-des-tiers-ta-marseille-4e-ch-24-dec-2025-n\/"},"author":{"name":"Alexia","@id":"https:\/\/abeille.law\/#\/schema\/person\/74121f107200139ab163607c1e620a36"},"headline":"Affichage irr\u00e9gulier mais non substantiel : application du d\u00e9lai raisonnable\u00a0\u00ab\u202fCzabaj\u202f\u00bb\u00a0\u00a0au\u00a0recours des tiers (TA Marseille, 4e ch., 24 d\u00e9c. 2025, n\u00b0 2406698)\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0","datePublished":"2026-03-02T09:15:31+00:00","dateModified":"2026-03-03T09:18:06+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/abeille.law\/affichage-irregulier-mais-non-substantiel-application-du-delai-raisonnable-czabaj-au-recours-des-tiers-ta-marseille-4e-ch-24-dec-2025-n\/"},"wordCount":339,"commentCount":0,"articleSection":["Actualit\u00e9s","Juridiques"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/abeille.law\/affichage-irregulier-mais-non-substantiel-application-du-delai-raisonnable-czabaj-au-recours-des-tiers-ta-marseille-4e-ch-24-dec-2025-n\/#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/abeille.law\/affichage-irregulier-mais-non-substantiel-application-du-delai-raisonnable-czabaj-au-recours-des-tiers-ta-marseille-4e-ch-24-dec-2025-n\/","url":"https:\/\/abeille.law\/affichage-irregulier-mais-non-substantiel-application-du-delai-raisonnable-czabaj-au-recours-des-tiers-ta-marseille-4e-ch-24-dec-2025-n\/","name":"Affichage irr\u00e9gulier et d\u00e9lai raisonnable : le TA Marseille applique la jurisprudence Czabaj aux recours des tiers | Abeille Avocats","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/abeille.law\/#website"},"datePublished":"2026-03-02T09:15:31+00:00","dateModified":"2026-03-03T09:18:06+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/abeille.law\/#\/schema\/person\/74121f107200139ab163607c1e620a36"},"description":"Erreur d\u2019affichage non substantielle : le TA Marseille applique le d\u00e9lai raisonnable Czabaj et juge tardif le recours d\u2019un tiers introduit quatre ans apr\u00e8s le permis.","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/abeille.law\/affichage-irregulier-mais-non-substantiel-application-du-delai-raisonnable-czabaj-au-recours-des-tiers-ta-marseille-4e-ch-24-dec-2025-n\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/abeille.law\/affichage-irregulier-mais-non-substantiel-application-du-delai-raisonnable-czabaj-au-recours-des-tiers-ta-marseille-4e-ch-24-dec-2025-n\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/abeille.law\/affichage-irregulier-mais-non-substantiel-application-du-delai-raisonnable-czabaj-au-recours-des-tiers-ta-marseille-4e-ch-24-dec-2025-n\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Accueil","item":"https:\/\/abeille.law\/en\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Affichage irr\u00e9gulier mais non substantiel : application du d\u00e9lai raisonnable\u00a0\u00ab\u202fCzabaj\u202f\u00bb\u00a0\u00a0au\u00a0recours des tiers (TA Marseille, 4e ch., 24 d\u00e9c. 2025, n\u00b0 2406698)\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/abeille.law\/#website","url":"https:\/\/abeille.law\/","name":"Abeille Avocats","description":"","alternateName":"Abeille Avocats","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/abeille.law\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/abeille.law\/#\/schema\/person\/74121f107200139ab163607c1e620a36","name":"Alexia","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/abeille.law\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/abeille.law\/wp-content\/litespeed\/avatar\/f92646323a75d95d28b83ef6b84450d2.jpg?ver=1778762123","contentUrl":"https:\/\/abeille.law\/wp-content\/litespeed\/avatar\/f92646323a75d95d28b83ef6b84450d2.jpg?ver=1778762123","caption":"Alexia"}}]}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/abeille.law\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/13996","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/abeille.law\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/abeille.law\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/abeille.law\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/18"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/abeille.law\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=13996"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/abeille.law\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/13996\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":13997,"href":"https:\/\/abeille.law\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/13996\/revisions\/13997"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/abeille.law\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=13996"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/abeille.law\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=13996"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/abeille.law\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=13996"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}